Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Louisa Chirico vs Ilona Kremen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chirico vs Kremen analysis and find out who is favored!
Louisa Chirico vs Ilona Kremen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chirico 1 - 0 Kremen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chirico has won 47.97% of points on their second serve, while Kremen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chirico, in recent form, has won 57.03% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kremen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.22% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chirico has saved 56.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kremen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chirico has won 54.55% of matches played (W/L 36/ 30), with Kremen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chirico has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 155/ 96), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8). Kremen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 155/ 98), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 42/ 40).
- Player level: In the last year, Chirico has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.41% of matches (W/L 31/ 23), where as Kremen has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chirico winning 1 times and Kremen being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chirico winning 2 and Kremen winning 0. The last match between Chirico and Kremen was at the New Braunfels, 27-10-2014, First, Hard with Louisa Chirico getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chirico and Kremen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chirico winning 0 times and Kremen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chirico winning 0, and Kremen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chirico has played against opponents with an average rank of 213.33 while Kremen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chirico has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kremen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chirico has converted 50.16% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kremen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
218
Rank
58
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
201
High
30
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
56% (303-236)
Career Total W/L
58% (237-170)
56% (20-16)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$623,285
Career Prize Money
$2,950
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Louisa Chirico vs Ilona Kremen For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Chirico VS Kremen
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Louisa Chirico | Ilona Kremen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Louisa Chirico | Ilona Kremen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (20/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (46/35) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (414/369) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 61% (19/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 81 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 151 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:20 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 214.94 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1676/2685) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (1026/1676) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (484/1009) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (159/317) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (1192/2595) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (20/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (19/35) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 46% (6/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 30% (3/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (24/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (24/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Louisa Chirico Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Louisa Chirico
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nadia Podoroska
Player
Louisa Chirico
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
43 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
1-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Francisca Jorge
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kateryna Baindl
Player
Louisa Chirico
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
70%
(
92 of
132)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
55 of
92)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
58 of
132)
124
Total Points Won
117
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Gabriela Ce
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Federica Urgesi
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Louisa Chirico
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Nicole Fossa Huergo
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Louisa Chirico
58%
(
71 of
123)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
126)
4
Aces
5
10
Double Faults
8
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
46%
(
24 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
46%
(
57 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
61 of
126)
127
Total Points Won
122
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ilona Kremen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Tatsiana Sasnouskaya
Player
Ilona Kremen
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ilona Kremen
Player
Alina Silich
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
7
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniela Vismane
Player
Ilona Kremen
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
75%
(
54 of
72)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
49%
(
36 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 3-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valeriya Strakhova
Player
Ilona Kremen
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
81%
(
38 of
47)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilona Kremen
Player
Anna Ureke
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
22 of
36)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
17 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
43
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ilona Kremen
Player
Diana Demidova
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
78%
(
54 of
69)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
51%
(
27 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
1-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ilona Kremen
Player
Alisa Kummel
55%
(
40 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
0
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
11
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
30%
(
10 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
56%
(
41 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 1-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Shalimar Talbi
Player
Ilona Kremen
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ilona Kremen
Player
Karina Kalkenova
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Ukolova
Player
Ilona Kremen
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
45%
(
17 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
53%
(
33 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
47 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | ||
view more
Chirico Vs Kremen Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Chirico are available here and Kremen photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
